beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.22 2017가단5170255

대여금

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) 82,902,119 won to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff; and (b) 22. The period from February 13, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a)the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and each of the changed reasons for the claim;

(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').

Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2, and Article 150 subparagraph 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The Plaintiff’s claim determination on November 6, 2017, in the proceeding of the instant lawsuit, transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim indicated in the separate sheet, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.