beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.17 2017고단4367

공무집행방해

Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16090, Jan. 1

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2017, around 03:05, the Defendant: (a) brought off a taxi from D-si in front of the store located in Gwangju Nam-gu, Gwangju; (b) filed a report on the dispute at the trial cost of fees; and (c) took two times as drinking the chest of the above G-G on the ground that the police officer F, who was the police officer of the Namnam Police Station, and the above F, prevented him from taking a bath for G on the ground that the F, who was a police officer of the Namnam Police Station, was at the seat of the said G-si, was at the seat of two occasions; and (d) the said F and G saw saw saw saw saw saw her her to take the her hand by arresting the Defendant as an offender in the act of interfering with the performance of official duties

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted G as above and interfered with the police officer’s 112 report processing duties and arrest duties in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A statement of H;

1. Side photographs of the victim G grandchildren, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (referring to a witness H telephone investigation);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances, such as the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances of sentencing as indicated in the record.

The defendant is led to confession, and is seriously against himself.

Defendant has no record of criminal punishment, except for a criminal punishment of a fine due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on December 2013.