(A) The defendant explicitly withdraws his argument to the effect that he contests intention or illegality recognition on the date of trial. 2. The defendant recognized and opposed to the judgment.

It seems that there is no economic benefit from the crime of this case.

There is no record of punishment for the same crime.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant lent his name check to the person who was not the victim, and the so-called one-called one-called one-called one-way passbook, which is distributed therefrom, is the starting point of the crime that is planned and organized, such as Bosing and illegal gambling, and is highly likely to cause large amounts of damage, so it is necessary to make a strict punishment.

In full view of other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in records and pleadings, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.