난민불인정결정취소
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the ground for admitting this case is the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following contents to the third 9 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it is citing this as is in accordance with Article 8(2)
At the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff stated that “The Plaintiff was threatened by coercioning the Plaintiff to open to the police on May 2017, 2017, and by assaulting it.” However, at the time of refugee interview, it appears that the Plaintiff did not act against the AP or join the organization against the AP, and at the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff stated that “the Plaintiff was issued a passport for a clerical error in Korea in 2014” at the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff did not clearly indicate the motive for the AP to be issued with special attention of the Plaintiff, and there was no evidence to objectively confirm the content of the threat of the AP, the Plaintiff did not know that “the Plaintiff received a report from the police on May 2017, 201,” but did not know the result when it was reported to the police on June 2017, 201, but it was difficult to view the Plaintiff’s statement that it was a change in the details of the APP without any justifiable reason.”
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.