사기등
Defendant
All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable because of the fact that the sentence of the court below (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the defendant was sentenced to one year for fraud at the Changwon District Court on October 1, 2003. On September 10, 2004, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case against many victims over a considerable period of time, including imprisonment of six months with prison labor at the Busan District Court on September 10, 2004. Although the defendant was sentenced to six months for fraud, etc., the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case for a considerable period of time. At the time of the crime of fraud, the defendant was not in compliance with the law of the crime of this case, such as exercising private documents directly forged, and the defendant was not in compliance with the law of the crime of this case. From among the damages, the amount of KRW 657 million was paid to the victim C and E, the total amount of KRW 247 million was not recovered from the damages other than the payment of KRW 547 million to the victim D, the defendant was found to have not been able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be considered too unfair or unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.