[criminal record] The Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won on October 26, 2012, by obstructing the performance of official duties, etc. in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, and on December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstructing the performance of official duties in the same court on December 23, 2015 and was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence on December 31, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive during the period of suspended

[2] The Defendant: (a) on February 15, 2016, within the Defendant’s residence located in the Hanam-si, Sinnam-si; (b) on February 15, 2016, F, his spouse, was assaulted by the Defendant; and (c) on the report of the domestic violence case, the Defendant reported the domestic violence case to H in the circumstances belonging to the G District of the Southern Police Station that called the Defendant and called out for, “ whatever I

followed. Doese to South Korean family history;

Habbbbing the brea, “Abreing the breath,” and assaulted the H, etc. one time as a breath, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling domestic violence cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attached to 112 mobilization situation;

1. In the event that the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor in the mitigated area (one month to August 8) of the first type (person with a special mitigation) in the mitigated area (one month to January 1), the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor for the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of a sentence, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment], and the defendant's sentence is inevitable in light of the fact that he/she committed a crime of obstructing the execution of official duties by being sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence for six months due to interference with the execution of official duties, and was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence for six months

In determining the punishment, the defendant's age, sex, family environment, means and methods of committing the crime of this case, police officers did not have an injury, and when this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the suspension of execution can be invalidated.