폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
The judgment below
We reverse the acquittal portion on the violence.
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim F by assaulting the victim F in combination with D as shown in the facts charged and that the victim H was assaulted, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.
2. Prior to the judgment on the ground for appeal on the part of the ground for ex officio judgment as to the part of the violence, the prosecutor applied for amendments to the indictment with the content that the victim bats bat, bats bats bat and bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats bats b
However, the prosecutor's argument of mistake of facts on the above part is still subject to a trial of the party to the extent that it corresponds to the changed facts charged.
3. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion
A. The summary of the charges of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) against the victim F is as follows: D in collaboration with the defendant; the defendant, around 14:40 on June 7, 2009, at the stairs entrance of the C church underground parking lot located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the reason that the victim F (the age of 64) had tried to mediate the settlement of the assault case that occurred while engaging in an act of opposing the above church's joining pastor, and had been stopped and started before it, the above D tried to kill the victim's ethth, and pushed the victim's body with stairs, and the defendant carried the victim's ethth, and carried the victim's ethical body and carried the victim's eths into stairs. 2) The evidence consistent with the above charges of the judgment, there was an investigation agency of F and the court below, the witness witness witness's statement at the trial court.
However, in light of the following circumstances recognized by the record, the above statements are stated.