If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 7, 2011, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from the rating obtained by making it excessive calculation of points and excessive discharge of books used for free gifts, despite having undergone a review of the rating classification with the content that points are calculated according to the user’s ability, and provided game products with the contents different from the rating obtained by making it excessive if the points are changed through a game installation business entity for the purpose of calculating the excess points, and allowing customers who find the place to use the game to use free gifts to use free gifts so that customers who want to receive free gifts obtained from the game will receive free gifts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45, Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry (which uses or provides game products, the contents of which are different from those of the classification), Article 44 (1) 2, and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (which conducts business of exchanging results acquired through the use of game products) concerning the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;