The plaintiffs are individual entrepreneurs engaged in ordinary cargo, special cargo, trper transportation business, etc. as stated in the separate sheet No. 1 list, and the defendant Lee Hy e-mail Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the defendant Lee e-mail") is a corporation which is engaged in general cargo, special cargo, container, heavy equipment transportation business, etc., and the defendant Ko e-mail Corporation (hereinafter "the defendant Ko e-mail") is a corporation that is engaged in trucking transportation business, etc.

B. A cargo transport contract between the Defendants, and the conclusion of a cargo transport contract between the Defendants (i) around November 201, 201 between the Defendants, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant transport contract”) entered into a cargo transport contract with the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant transport contract”) with respect to the Defendant Co., Ltd.’s container transport between the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant transport contract”) and the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant transport contract”). In order to carry out the said cargo transport contract, the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant transport contract”) entered into a cargo transport contract with the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Moman’s container transport from Hyundai Echis Co., Ltd.) to the cargo terminal located in Masan-si, U.S., Inc. (hereinafter “U.S.’s mobile cargo

C. According to the instant transport contract, the Plaintiffs transported the containers of Hyundai Mos Co., Ltd. from June 26, 2013 to July 27, 2013, according to the terms of the instant transport contract, and accordingly, the transport charges indicated in the column for “Unpaid transport charges” in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “each transport charges”).

(2) However, the Defendant Lewn comprehensive transport charges of this case.