도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On March 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on March 11, 201, and a person sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for ten months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on June 16, 201.
On October 19, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol 0.126% among blood, the Defendant driven BSM car at approximately KRW 800 meters from the front of the GGGG cafeteria cafeteria cafeteria, located as the center of the Daegu Northernbuk-gu, Seoul, to the front of the apartment apartment day, which was born on 53 roads, as the center of the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, 201.
As a result, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation, text of judgment, and summary order-making statute;
1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the frequency and time when the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the concentration of alcohol in blood at the time of driving the drinking of this case, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered by considering the various factors for sentencing as stated in the argument of this case.