The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The defendant is deemed to have led each of the crimes of this case, but the nature of the crime still did not reach an agreement with a considerable number of victims in light of the Act on the Acceptance of Crimes of this case and the frequency of crimes, and the fact that there has been a record of being suspended from indictment twice due to the same thief during the last two years, and all of the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, criminal records, and risk of recidivism, shall be considered as being excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.