2. The degree of damage caused by the instant crime of injury is relatively weak due to the occurrence of the instant crime of injury by the victims on the ground that the victims need to receive treatment for about two weeks.

The defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case, and is in depth divided.

The victim D wanted to take the board by mutual consent with the defendant, and there is also a situation in which it is difficult for the defendant to take the family form.

However, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case with two fines imposed on the same kind of crime.

The defendant found the victims' house, and caused the victims to take the scene of the case, and the digital camera used by the victims to take the scene of the case, and damaged and damaged the seed floor, and the nature of the crime is heavy.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.