2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by Defendant BU.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. 1) The Seoul Mapo-gu R and S co-owners of the land shall remove the apartment houses on the above ground on June 2003 and then construct new apartment houses (hereinafter “instant association”) for the purpose of reconstruction project.

U.S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “U”) organized and operated by Defendant T.

(2) The main contents of the above reconstruction project agreement are that U is a reconstruction project implementor who constructed an officetel with only the prescribed shares of the site and the prescribed shares necessary for the implementation of the project from its members, and then the general sale except the shares of the union members is sold on behalf of the above union members and the construction cost is appropriated from the sale price.

(hereinafter “instant reconstruction project agreement”). (b)

1) On June 28, 2003, U was granted a building permit for an officetel consisting of “Defendant V and 47 (the total number of 48 persons, including Defendant 2, 7 through 49, 64, W, X, and Y,” and “Seoul Mapo-gu Z, AAA, R, S, and AB” (hereinafter “instant officetel”) and Defendant B were co-owners of the said AA and AB site, and the Defendant B did not participate in the said reconstruction project. (c) Since the said site was excluded from the said Z site, the name of September 9, 2005 was changed to “Defendant V and 45 (the owner of the said Z site was excluded from the co-owner of the said Z site).”

'AC' operated by Defendant T-AC

On April 12, 2004, the project was completed on November 2, 2009, following U.S. status under the instant reconstruction project agreement.

E. AD association received a decision on provisional disposition prohibiting the disposal of real estate for each of the households of the instant officetels with the right to claim the registration of additional establishment against some of its members as the preserved right, and upon a request for registration following the provisional disposition decision, "real estate of this case listed in the separate sheet No. 1 of April 9, 2009" is "real estate of this case."

The owner is the nominal owner at the time of September 9, 2005.