However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-learning car.

At around 00:40 on April 17, 2014, the Defendant proceeded along the two-lanes along the direction from the right edge to the right edge of the D road located in Yong-gun, Yong-gun, Youngnam.

Since there was a vehicle driven earlier at night, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to live well, maintain the safety distance, and proceed with it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found it late to discover and stop an article protruding to the road by the Flandn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, avoided the injury to the victim E, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of a wood that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, suffered from the injury to the victim G (the 54 years old), who is the partner of the said Grand City car, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and escaped without immediately stopping the said Grand City car to rescue the victim, even though it damages the repair cost equivalent to KRW 6,505,244.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate (E), a medical certificate (G);

1. Application of written estimate (F)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime by applicable law;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of the penalty;