자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
A. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a person possessing C Poter vehicles.
The Defendant did not subscribe to liability insurance for the foregoing vehicle.
As such, no motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on the road.
Nevertheless, on October 11, 2013, the defendant operated the above vehicle at D in front of the Gu Council of the Gu Council around 23:00.
B. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving vehicles C.
On October 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 23:00, while driving the vehicle at the speed of about 40km of the Seoul Metropolitan Dobongsan-do, the two-lane of the two-lane 4-lane of the Dobongsan-do, Seoul.
No person engaged in driving service of motor vehicles shall change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change course of his/her motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change course to the right-hand side of the vehicle, followed by the driver E (the 42 years of age, south)’s seat of the same room, who was going into a three-lane top of the same room, and followed by the booming part on the top of the steering line of the vehicle.
Ultimately, by occupational negligence, the Defendant destroyed the vehicle owned by the victim so that the amount of 133,580 won (excluding additional taxes) is equal to the repair cost, such as the exchange of the victim’s vehicle sludge (a rear fences, fences, etc.).
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. E statements;
1. The actual condition survey report, traffic accident occurrence report, on-site photographs, estimates, and mandatory insurance policies;
1. Although the Defendant alleged that there was no crime since a traffic accident occurred due to the negligence of the victim, not himself/herself, in the damaged vehicle video works, according to the result of the verification of the black box video works, he/she shocked the victim's vehicle that the Defendant was in progress while changing the tea.