When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a small-scale taxi in C.

On November 28, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on November 28, 2011:50, and operated at a speed of about 60 km in speed, depending on one speed among three-lanes, from the long-distance flood control area in Daegu-gu, the direction of the Emtima Hospital located in Daegu-gu.

Since there is a place where the central line of yellow solid lines and a pentle to prevent unauthorized crossing has been installed, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care not to drive the center line with the duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected his operation and broomed into the victim F (58 years old) driving beyond the central line, and received the front portion of the Defendant’s driver’s license’s license in front of the left portion of the Ginnata taxi, which was 58 years old.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F, such as catitis, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim H (the passenger who was aboard the said G Sota-si), including clothes, bones, etc. requiring medical treatment for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report and each traffic accident report (1, 2) (1, 2) (1), respectively;

1. A report on investigation by telephone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the Defendant’s depth of the instant crime, the victims and the results of the instant crime, and other factors of sentencing, including the motive, means and result, circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., shall be comprehensively taken into account, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered.