If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

From October 9, 2012 to October 15:40, 2012, the Defendants conspired to supply and demand from the FG operated by the victim E in Chungcheongnam-si from 12:00 to 15:40 on October 22, 2012, and interfered with the victim’s work of civil engineering by force by obstructing the victim’s work of civil engineering by way of force, in order to ensure that the creation of a new site for factory and the construction site for maintaining agricultural and fishing villages, the victim’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s promise to receive village development funds from the above company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (the points of agreement with victims are considered to be reached smoothly);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the provisional payment orders;