보조금 환수처분 등 처분 취소 청구
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, and the court's explanation of this case is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment of the plaintiff's assertion to the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be accepted as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(Other, the grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the appeal do not differ significantly from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the fact-finding and the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the plaintiff's claim is justifiable). [The part which was dismissed] The court of first instance 9, 11, 10, 6, 13, 9, 15, 3, 5, 17, 18 and 3 "this court" shall be decided as "the first instance court", respectively.
The 13th sentence of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from the 5th sentence “(A evidence 7-1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9)” to the same 5th sentence.
"A de facto marriage relationship with P, which is de facto marital relationship with P working in this area, shall be deleted from 14th 5 and 6th 14th 5 of the judgment of the first instance."
The 15th 14th 15th son of the judgment of the first instance shall be subject to the 4th "disposition".
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff asserts that C, along with D, had been actually working as the Plaintiff’s male shelter cook.
However, even if the statements in Gap's evidence Nos. 3, 80 and 83, 85 and 89, 152 and 158 (including each number), submitted to this court, are not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
B. The second disposition plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's second disposition E had been actually residing and worked as a nurse of the plaintiff's female shelter.
However, Gap submitted up to this Court, Nos. 7, 90 and 100, 159, 159.