However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, at around 02:30 on June 19, 2014, when drinking alcohol in D’s “D” located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) feel a sudden desire for the victim E (the age of 37) who is a customer to return from the toilet to his/her own job; (b) released all the bucker and the bucker of the boom; and (c) forced the victim to dance on his/her side.

The Defendant stated that the victim who tried to get out of the job “I am kn, we see it,” and put the victim’s back timber in hand with the victim’s knife and bucks.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant, without calculating the drinking value, tried to go against the victim, without going through the consent of the victim, at the time, place, and place indicated in paragraph 1.

Therefore, in order for the victim to prevent the defendant from having the defendant, the victim's hand bucks the defendant's hand, bucks the victim's hand, bucks the victim's hand, and bucks the victim's head in excess of the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of witness F in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. Voluntary report and investigation report;

1. The defendant and the victim of the damaged photograph (victim) and the E and G showed that the defendant had been observed and considered as a problem of the drinking value, and it appears that the defendant was able to wear the defendant after considering the fact that the indecent act was damaged by E, the police who was dispatched immediately after the report of the case seems to have told the fact that E was an indecent act, the E's clothes are teared, and E's statement that the color of the defendant's clothes is a color, and the police officer requested the confirmation of the clothes of the defendant, but the defendant refused to do so.