For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendants on the grounds that all of the parts of the charges in this case concerning the Defendants’ obstruction of duties had no proof of crime, and acquitted the Defendants on the grounds that there was no proof of crime in all of the violation of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act among the charges in this case committed by the lower court.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free conviction due to violating logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the obstruction of duties, the threat of interference with duties, and the violation of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.