2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant made confession of all of the crimes of this case and recognized his mistake, and that some crimes are in ex post concurrent relations with the crimes for which the judgment became final and conclusive in the case of some crimes.

However, the total number of crimes committed by the Defendant is 48 times (five times of larceny, thirty-four times of fraud, forgery of private documents, seven times of use of the above investigation document, and embezzlement of deserted articles) and the degree of illegality is very significant. Each fraud committed by the Defendant is very poor as the so-called "crime of fraud of price for Internet goods" committed by the majority against the unspecified majority, and most of the offenses committed by the Defendant are: (a) fraud including fraud of the above Internet price for goods; (b) fraud including fraud of private document; (c) fraud of document; (d) fraud of document; (d) fraud of document; (e) fraud; and (e) violation of the law specialized in credit finance is not contingent crimes; (e) the Defendant has a history of criminal protective disposition and criminal punishment against the Defendant several times due to larceny and fraud; and (e) the Defendant did not recover any damage to property crimes that occupy a large part of each of the crimes committed in this case; and (e) the Defendant does not appear to have any possibility of punishing or punishing some of the offenses committed within five years of the sentencing guidelines applied.

Therefore, the defendant does not accept the defendant's unfair argument.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and thus, it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.