1. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant C and the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court maintained by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and exceeding the bounds of the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the Defendants A, B, D, E, and F of the public prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court’s maintenance of the first instance court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, which found the Defendants not guilty of the facts charged of this case, on the ground that there was no proof of the relevant crime, is justifiable. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.