If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On November 11, 2015, the Defendant, at a factory E, a corporation operated by the Defendant located in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, separately disposes of the discarded small and medium-sized oil generated in the process of factory operation through the separation of flowing water, and thus, the aforementioned petroleum products, which are not completely separated from the separation of flowing water due to the occupational negligence neglecting the management of the separation of flowing water, leaked oil, through excellent pipes, into a straight-scale, public waters adjacent to factory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Results of on-site inspections by this court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to F (including attached materials);

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and field photographs;

1. Article 78 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Act on the Selection of Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation and Article 15 (1) 1 of the same Act and the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a serious crime that has a fatal impact on national health and the environment, and has a characteristic that makes it difficult to recover damage to the environment due to it, and the defendant has a record of punishment for the same kind of crime, under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, the confession of the defendant is against the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no record of crime more than the suspension of execution is considered as favorable to the defendant. However, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc. shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant'