2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime and reflected the mistake.

However, the defendant has already been punished several times for the same crime, and only 20 days after he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and 1 year and 6 months for the same crime, repeated each of the crimes of this case, and thus, the nature of the crime is not very good, and no damage recovery has been achieved until the trial.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and all the circumstances constituting the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.