However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On 14. 04:30 on 14. 02. 14. 04. 04. 04.30, the Defendant does not sit on the way to which his substitute driver will sit.

“A slope C belonging to the Busan Police Station B District, which was dispatched to the site upon receiving the report of 112, takes the shoulder of the Defendant, and a erobbbbbial C. Although C notified that he was a police officer, he/she continues to “A ebbbial ebs and ebbs in fribs” even though C notified that he/she was a police officer.

“In doing a bath theory, “A booming C’s bat, batling C’s fat, and bating D’s catch fat, bating D’s catch fat and bating D’s batch fat, batthing D’s bat, and cating D’s bats with a wall.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C, D, and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of sentence of alternative imprisonment;

4. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act).