If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc. even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages at the D subject point operated by the victim C.

Nevertheless, around April 20, 2014: around 30, 2014: Around 30:30, he/she performed as if he/she would pay alcoholic beverage and alcohol, and ordered beer and beer, etc., and he/she received an amount equivalent to KRW 390,00,00 in total, such as beer 60 bottles, beer 3,000, and service charges for female employees, and did not pay the amount of alcohol and the amount of alcoholic beverage value, etc., so he/she acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. A report on investigation (a written estimate of damage);

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.