[criminal history] The defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on May 28, 2003; on March 26, 2004, the same court was sentenced to a fine of 1 million won for the same crime; on August 17, 2005, the same court was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the same crime; on February 3, 2010, the same court was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won for the same crime; on September 22, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won for the same crime; and on August 8, 2015, the same court was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for the same crime, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence in the so-called detention house.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 12, 2015, the Defendant driven B cargo at a section of about 10 meters from September 12, 2015, which was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.169% in blood without a driver’s license, to the front day of Samsung Home plug in Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, with the influence of alcohol content of 0.169% in the blood.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) was driving along the first lane between the five-lanes at the Seocho-do Intersections of the Seocho-do, Busan Metropolitan City, as stated in paragraph (1). As such, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving, had a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to operate the steering gear well.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and failed to operate the steering gear properly, and caused the negligence that caused the defendant's driver's vehicle to be separated from the center in the direction of progress to the top part of the left side of the driver's vehicle.

Thus, the defendant caused the damage to the repair cost of 539,070 won by occupational negligence in the center street trees owned by the Busan Metropolitan Government Office.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) drive the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, at the same time and at the same place as Paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant;