When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who resides in B apartment house No. 3, and the victim D is a person who resides in the above apartment building No. 5, and the defendant and the victim have frequently disputed the issue of noise noise between floors.

On March 10, 2020, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) 11, 12 days in order to look at the matter of noise; (b) 11 days in front of the 23:00 Yangnam-si B apartment joint entrance; (c) opened the victim to the above location; and (d) opened the victim’s inside part of the drinking house; and (e) opened the victim’s bridge, which is opened up on the floor, and walking the victim’s bridge, which is opened up on the floor, so as to be 14 days in need of approximately 14 days in treatment; (b) 11 and 12 days in front of both arms and elbows and 31 days in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each of the defendant's legal statement D or G taking a police protocol of each police officer's protocol of witness examination to cover the CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not correspond to the punishment for the crime that the defendant inflicts an injury on the victim. However, considering the fact that the defendant appears to have committed a contingent crime during the dispute due to inter-floor noise problem, including the victim's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the amount of fine for the summary order shall be partially reduced and decided as ordered by taking into account all the factors of sentencing specified in the argument of the case, including the victim's age, character