Around 12:15 on May 5, 2018, the Defendant driven a BK7 car and went into the right-side area of a scamb from the scamb from the scambing surface to the scambing surface of the scambing surface. The Defendant neglected his duty of care to safely drive the scambling and drive the scam to the right-hand side of the central line, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the scambing and drive the scam on the opposite lane by neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the scambling the scam on the scambling part of the above scambling part of the above k7 car. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the scambing of the scambing at the right-hand side of the scambus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Each photograph (the sequence 4,6,20 of the evidence list);

1. A copy of a medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each black boxes and video CDs

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 3(1) and (2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 3(2)2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act / [Determination of the type] of traffic accident in general / [Determination of the sphere of recommendation] / [Scope of recommendation] four months to one year / [general sentencing person] - General Automobile Insurance - In the event a serious injury, other than an injury, occurs among the aggravated factors / General Automobile Insurance - In the event of Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the same criminal record that does not constitute a repeated offense [decision of sentence] The above sentencing person and the degree of damage caused by the accident in this case, degree of violation of the defendant's duty of care, etc. shall be considered.