beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.09 2014가합53918

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant PP cooperative refers to the Plaintiff as indicated in the attached Form “Plaintiff” column of the calculation sheet in the attached Form.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are corporations or individuals established for the purpose of living-orientedizing industrial products, etc. and wholesale and retail business of agricultural and fishery products, etc.

On November 5, 2010, the Defendant Incheon Metropolitan City established the S Logistics Center (hereinafter “instant logistics center”) in Jung-gu, Incheon, and concluded a management and operation agreement of the instant logistics center on two occasions on November 12, 2010 with the Defendant Cooperative (hereinafter “Defendant Cooperative”) and had the Defendant Cooperative operate the instant logistics center on two occasions on October 16, 2012.

B. The Plaintiffs, from October 2013 to December 2013, 2013, concluded a commodity supply contract with the content that the Plaintiffs would supply the goods and quantity to the Plaintiffs, on the basis of the proposal of U.S. employee, etc. (part of the Plaintiff entered into a goods supply contract with the Plaintiff, and as seen below, T and C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “T”) orders the Plaintiffs to supply the goods and quantity, except in cases where it is specifically referred to otherwise.

(hereinafter “each of the instant goods supply contracts”) C.

The Plaintiffs, from October 2013 to December 2013, 2013, supplied goods equivalent to the amount indicated in the “price of goods” column in the annexed calculation sheet, but T paid only some of the price of goods to the Plaintiffs as indicated in the “payment sheet” column in the annexed calculation sheet.

【Ground of recognition】 In the absence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 39, 41, 43, 44, 45, 47, and 48 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), each of the images of Gap evidence No. 40, witness W, and X’s testimony and all of the arguments

2. The parties' assertion

A. The 1st Plaintiffs’ assertion concluded each of the instant goods supply agreements with T and the goods.