A. Each sentence (Defendant A: fine of KRW 15,640,00, confiscation, and fine of KRW 15,640,000) that the court below sentenced the Defendants to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the primary offender A, the period, frequency, and size of smuggling exports, and the disadvantageous circumstances that have significant characteristics of the crime, the lower court appears to have reduced the amount of fine under the summary order by taking into account the favorable circumstances above, and the fact that there is no change in the sentencing conditions that may be considered in the first instance trial, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the character, conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, etc. of the Defendants, the lower court cannot be deemed to have been deemed to have been too heavy or too unreasonable since each sentence sentenced to the Defendants is too heavy.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals by the Defendants and the prosecutor against the Defendants are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.