beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.24 2017고단5599

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. and the Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization Act and the Defendant: (a) the victim C (V, 43 years of age) related to resistant-related persons was forced to contact the Defendant; and (b) the victim’s telephone carrier using the Defendant’s portable phone at around 00:01 on August 19, 2016 to the effect that, if the victim’s telephone carrier maintains an internal relationship with the Defendant, the victim’s family members would be aware of the

v. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.D.

If you look at photographs, comments and comments, we will see my mind;

On June 9, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes, including sending the text message “I expected to pay”, sent letters to the victim’s portable phone phone, using the victim’s text function or Kakakakao Stockholm function from that time to 37 times on June 9, 2017, or posted repeated comments on the victim’s cell phone (D).

As a result, the Defendant repeatedly sent the text that arouses fear or apprehension through information and communications network to the victim, and at the same time threatened the victim by transmitting the message with the content that seems to cause harm to the victim, such as 6, 7, 15, 15 through 18, 20, 21, 23 through 26, 30, 32, 34, and 37 sub-paragraph 1 through 3, 6, 7, 15, 20, 21, 23 through 26,

2. Around May 12, 2017, the Defendant’s insultd the Defendant’s 1’s “F” posting a notice on the ENber Blobbbb, as indicated in the foregoing “1” list, and posting a notice on the “G” list using the “H”, which is a NA’s ID, the Defendant subscribed to the Defendant’s her own name, with the Defendant’s “h, while living in the Republic of Korea, would not use it for the Defendant’s physical and mental desire, and if one’s own circumstances do not take more consideration of the other party’s own situation, it would not be available.