beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.11.19 2020고정344

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 21:00 on January 30, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was the victim E (22 years of age) who is the same hospital in C Hospital D Hospital D's hospital located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and (b) was punished on the ground that he did not pay the purchase price for the street and mobile phone sold by the victim before the Defendant, and the Defendant was discharged from the Defendant before the victim; (c) was the victim of the first assault from the victim; (d) was the victim of the assault; and (e) the victim continued to use the victim's life booming part of the victim's life booming part of the victim's drinking; and (e) the victim was also the victim's drinking to the defendant, who was frighting the victim to drink, sold the victim's drinking to the victim for treatment for a period of six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's written diagnosis of injury to the witness examination protocol of the defendant's partial statement E, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the injury suffered by the victim was caused by his negligence, and that the defendant did not inflict any injury as to the victim's crime, and that the victim's drinking house was an accident which was unexpectedly occurred and had no intention on the part of the defendant.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court are: (a) the victim made a relatively consistent statement that the defendant had been faced with the bones of drinking, the victim was first at the time of the defendant; (b) the defendant was also deemed to have committed drinking; (c) the victim was faced with the victim's drinking while the victim was faced with the victim's drinking in the process; and (d) the victim was deemed to have been faced with the victim's drinking; and therefore, (e) the defendant was judged to have inflicted an injury like the crime by intentionally assaulting the victim, and as alleged in the above, it cannot be deemed that there was no intention to inflict an injury on the defendant.