When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around 21:00 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the E-corporate office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 7, sought to recover the Defendant’s debt from the victim; (b) did not receive reimbursement; (c) thereby, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the amount equivalent to KRW 7,824,80,00 in total of repair dogs, such as Samsung Laborpt computers, Dognet, electrical, air straw, exhibition site, sampling, telephone, display site, cellle, display site, and table, which were kept in the office using the crebs without the victim.

2. On March 9, 2013, at around 16:00, the Defendant destroyed the crebs without the victim in the place specified in paragraph (1) so that the repair cost would be destroyed by breaking the door of the crebs to an influence.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial;

1. A copy of the DNA statements;

1. Photographss and photographs of damaged scene;

1. A list of property damage and a written estimate [the third trial records include both the witness D's statement and a copy of D's statement among the third trial records, all of which are written by F, and thus, admissible as a matter of principle as it constitutes documents in which the full text and the full text are written. However, the F's statement related to each crime as stated in the judgment is admissible as evidence in accordance with Articles 314 and 316 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering the following: F's statement and the process of the statement, F's statement, F's act before and after each crime as stated in the judgment, F's behavior, F's relation, and F's relation with the defendant, etc., in light of the fact that F's behavior before and after each crime as stated in the judgment, is not showing any special circumstance that F is biased to make a statement unfavorable to the defendant. Thus, the above expert evidence is admissible as evidence pursuant to Articles 314 and 316

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment shall be punished by a fine;