However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on May 1, 2014, at the C convenience store located in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) on May 1, 2014, at around 01:23, the Defendant: (c) asked the suspect whether he was a son in order to verify the site situation; (d) the circumstances leading up to the D District Unit of the Chungcheong Police Station called up after receiving a report that a male frighted frighted frighted frighted frighted frighted fright; (e) the breast frightd frighted fright; and (e) the Defendant frightd frightd frightd fright, and was arrested in the act of assault as above; and (e) on the same day, the Defendant frightd frightd fright to verify the Defendant’s personal information.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of the following: (a) there is no previous conviction for the same kind of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the degree of assault cannot be deemed severe; (c) the crime of this case is committed in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol; and (d) all of the crimes of