For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the instant facts charged (excluding the part concerning the charge) on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.