공익법인의설립운영에관한법률위반
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won, for each of the defendant’s incorporated associations.
However, the defendant A.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A as a director of Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Incorporated Association”), a representative of the said Incorporated Association is the Defendant Incorporated Association, and the Defendant Incorporated Association is a public interest corporation with the aim of developing a variety of potential for students, realizing community life education that coexists harmoniously while respecting different matters, enhancing the independent rights and responsibilities of teachers, and contributing to the improvement and development of national unity and development through education in the 21st century, and contributing to humanity, in accordance with the provisions of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Public Interest Corporations, in order to contribute to the general interest of society.
1. Where a public-service corporation intends to engage in profit-making business to achieve its objectives, it shall obtain approval from the competent administrative agency for each business, as prescribed by the articles of incorporation;
Nevertheless, the Defendant entered into an after-school entrustment contract with the competent administrative agency on March 1, 201, under the name of D elementary school and Defendant incorporated association in the name of D elementary school and Defendant, at D elementary school offices located in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City around March 1, 201.
The Defendant, including that, from around that time to September 1, 2013, operated a profit-making business with an aggregate of KRW 1,345,126,000 over 28 times without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency, such as the statement in the list of crimes attached hereto, in the name of the Defendant’s incorporated association.
2. A, a director of the Defendant, an incorporated by the Defendant, operated a profit-making business without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency, as described in paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement of witness E in the second public trial protocol;
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;
1. A written accusation, notice of audit results by the Board of Audit and Inspection, list of after-school contracts, and consignment operation contract;
1. A certified copy of the corporate registry, a non-profit private organization registration certificate;