beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.02.21 2018나1605

채무부존재확인

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance as to the principal lawsuit, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who confirmed that there is no debt under the following.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. According to the facts acknowledged as Gap's evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5, part of Gap evidence Nos. 2, C of the court of the first instance, results of fact inquiries about D of the D of the D of the D of the following facts, and the whole purport of the pleadings, the following facts may be acknowledged, respectively, and some of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 7, and 8 and evidence Nos. 2 are insufficient to reverse them.

On July 16, 2013, the Defendant entered the Plaintiff as an engineer and performed the work of installing a pipe or poppy rail in G Co., Ltd. located in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-IBL construction in the middle-gu, Ulsan-gu, G Co., Ltd., which the Plaintiff was subcontracted from E Co., Ltd., in order to prevent the fall during the pecing work and the moving of the rail, the Defendant carried out the work of installing a pipe or poppy rail in the passage, stairs, platform.

B. On August 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on August 20, 2013, the instant accident hereinafter referred to as “the first accident in which the Defendant, at the end of the opening where the iron in the shape of the shooting is not loaded, lost the center of the moment the safety net opened to prevent the fall, going over, and the string is broken off, and the string is broken down on the rail box installed in the front immediately.”

Section 2013, 2013

9. 8. At around 09:30, among the work, a pipe was cut off on the floor and a pipe was cut off on the opposite part of the floor and was caused by an accident over the floor (hereinafter “the second accident”), which is linked to the first accident (hereinafter “the accident”).

C. The defendant's accident of this case is "the injury of this case" of this case, which is "the injury of this case" of this case, which is "the injury of this case caused by the extreme satisfe in the shoulder part, the satfe in the shoulder part, the satfe in the shoulder part, the satfe in the shoulder part, the satch in the shoulder part

have suffered loss.

2. Judgment on the counterclaim

A. According to the occurrence of liability for damages and the recognition of the above-mentioned 1, the Plaintiff is not affected by workers’ prospects during their work in installing a safety net for the prevention of fall.