1. Examining the records of the accused case, the lower court’s rejection of the Defendant’s assertion on the defectiveness of the Defendant on the grounds of its stated reasoning is justifiable, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the defectiveness

In addition, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment, relationship with victims, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the determination of the lower court’s sentence that maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment for life cannot be deemed to be extremely unfair.

2. With respect to a case for which a request for attachment order is filed, a final appeal shall be deemed filed regarding the case for which the defendant files a final appeal.

However, there is no entry of reasons in the petition of appeal and there is no entry of reasons for objection in the appellate brief.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.