A. The plaintiff is a clan that is formed for the purpose of the protection of G's graves, the 16-year-old G's 16-year-old descendants, and the friendship among descendants, and the defendants are the clans of the plaintiff.

B. On March 28, 1984, the area of 109,389 square meters for D forest land was divided into 37,943 square meters for D forest land, 21,926 square meters for H forest land, 49,520 square meters for I forest land. On November 20, 1986, 1, 37,943 square meters for D forest land was divided into 37,943 square meters for 1,440 square meters for J, and the remainder was divided into the instant forest.

C. On March 28, 1984, the forest land of this case was registered for the transfer of the forest land of this case with the share of 1/2 of K and L, and on April 11, 200, the share of the above K was a gift to the defendant B, and the share of the above L was registered for each transfer of the above L due to the sale to the defendant B.

On June 11, 2012, the entire shares of Defendant B in the forest of this case (hereinafter “instant conciliation decision”) was completed on the ground of a decision in lieu of conciliation of the instant case (hereinafter “instant conciliation decision”), and the registration of transfer was completed on June 11, 201 with shares owned by Defendant C and Defendant B, respectively.

(Contents of the above mediation decision). 【No dispute exists concerning the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1-2, and Gap evidence 4-6

2. Before the Plaintiff’s assertion was divided, D forest land 109,389 square meters was jointly owned by the Plaintiff and M&A (hereinafter “M-type”), and the instant forest was divided into several lots of forest land on March 28, 1984 at the request of MM-type. The instant forest became owned by the Plaintiff.

On March 28, 1984, the Plaintiff registered the ownership transfer of the forest of this case to K, the father of Defendant B, and to Defendant C, the father of Defendant C, and completed the registration of the ownership transfer as a partnership-ownership not co-ownership.

Since then, the registration of transfer was completed as the sole ownership of the defendant B's shares, according to the mediation decision of this case, the registration of transfer was completed as the defendants' joint ownership.

In the process of the above mediation decision, Defendant B is the forest of this case.