2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. Defendant C registered the business under his/her own name D, and engaged in the manufacturing of her sonies with the trade name of F in Seogu-gu E.

B. Defendant C transferred his/her place of business to Daegu Dong-gu G and made business registration on March 6, 2013, and on April 12, 2013

It was designated as a business establishment subject to the intensive control standards (HACCP, hereinafter referred to as the "humbrow").

C. On May 30, 2013, Defendant C changed its trade name to H, and registered its business in the name of Defendant B (the opening date of business April 1, 2013).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 6 (including additional number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted as follows. (A) The Plaintiff and the Defendants concluded a contract with the Defendant around February 2003 on the primary argument that the Plaintiff asserted as follows. The content of the contract is that the Plaintiff invested expenses and human resources so that the Defendants can obtain the certification of the nives, thereby installing new facilities necessary for the Defendants’ factories, developing new nives (I), and trying to correct the nives ingredients and purchase materials, and distribute the nives in the name of “I and J” with the right to the sales of the lives in the name of “I” with the right to the sales of the lives. The Defendants are to manufacture and supply nives at prices other than material costs and personnel expenses in return for the Plaintiff’s efforts.

The Plaintiff, according to the above contract, worked at the factory to obtain a certification of the HCCP, was engaged in coloring work, installation of duct, installation of duct care care, repair of old machinery, etc., purchased office equipment and fixtures in order to carry out the business under the contract of this case, manufactured advertising materials, attached promotional materials, and completed broadcast advertisement.

On July 17, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the same process.