2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s failure to submit new materials for sentencing in the trial. The lower court did not recognize that the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.