A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for three years, by imprisonment for two years and six months, and by imprisonment for seven years.

[Judgment of the court below]

1. The parties’ status as Defendant E is the chairman of the “AC” under the name of Defendant A, B, C, D, etc. actually operated by the Defendants, A, X, Y, Z, AA, and AB (hereinafter “stock company”).

Defendant

A A graduated from the Agricultural Cooperative and worked in the Agricultural Cooperative of NAN, while he was working in the Agricultural Cooperative of NAN, submitted a business proposal and a business plan to the Agricultural Cooperatives and the Military Mutual Aid Association under the direction of Defendant E, and participated in the process of acquiring Y, while ordering each company to manage the funds of each company, along with Defendant B, who is the wife of Defendant E.

In addition, Defendant A served in W from March 30, 200 to August 4, 2009 as a director, and held 10% of W from February 16, 2001 to March 31, 2004; the auditor from January 17, 2006 to August 4, 2009; the director from August 10, 207 to August 4, 2009 to the representative director; the director from October 29, 2007 to the president from February 4, 2009 to the president; and the person who served in the position of the president in A and AB from February 16, 2001 to March 31, 2004 to the auditor; and the person who served in the position of the president in A and AB participated in the important decision-making decision-making.

Defendant

B As Defendant E’s wife completed the MBA course in Germany, a person who is proficient in the field of financing and accounting, and was in charge of financing and accounting in W, and was in charge of the business affairs in W, even if attached to W, is involved in the business affairs of X’s PF lending and the settlement of land work expenses for the same floor of the same building, and is involved in the business affairs of acquiring Y’s apartment and the raising of project funds through false sale of apartment, and participated in the important policy decision-making of the company operated by Defendant E.

Defendant

C. Defendant .