beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.10.17 2014고정386

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service with large-forest scenarios 110cc.

1. On January 15, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 17:35, the Defendant driven the instant Obaba at the section of approximately 700 meters from Schlage to the entrance of the Gabato village in the same area, where it is impossible to find out the trade name at the pre-maban-Gun release area while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.139%.

2. The defendant who violated the Automobile Management Act shall be operated by the defendant while on November 2013.

The number plate already cancelled was used unlawfully by attaching it as if it had been properly delivered from the Gun of B to the Y, which purchased the new B number plate.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, at the date and time, and at the place mentioned in paragraph (1), operated an automobile without mandatory insurance even though he was prohibited from driving an automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the status of a drinking driver, statement on the status of a drinking driver, and written report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. A criminal investigation report (reported circumstances, etc.);

1. - Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a letter requesting cooperation in issuing the register of two-wheeled motor vehicles;

1. Reduction of a fine in part by taking into account Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 2 of Article 78 and Article 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the selection of fines for each crime (the operation of automobiles which are not mandatory insurance), the selection of fines (the reflection of gender, the fact that the status of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State in Vietnam War is not good, etc.);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum amount of the crimes of the above-mentioned tax is aggregated);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;