골재채취법위반
Defendant
A and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of screening, crushing, manufacturing, producing, and selling aggregate.
1. Where a person who has reported the extraction of aggregate intends to change the reported details, he/she shall report such change to the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;
On or around 24, 2013, the Defendant entered the aggregate extracted from the above B in five parcels without reporting on the open site of aggregate, such as Ma, E, F, G, and H.
2. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: (a) at the above date, at the above place, Defendant B Co., Ltd. entered aggregate without filing a report of change on the business of Defendant B Co., Ltd.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Statement of the police statement to I;
1. A written accusation and a written accusation;
1. Satellite photographs and field photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificate all matters registered;
1. Articles 50 subparagraph 5 and 32 (2) (Defendant A) of the Act on the Acquisition of Aggregates under Relevant Acts on Criminal Facts, Articles 51, 50 subparagraph 5 of Article 50 and Article 32 (2) (Defendant B Stock Company) of the Aggregate Extraction Act, and selection of fines for each crime;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;
1. Defendant A and Defendant B corporation: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;