around August 28, 2008, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 100 million to the victim F, who decided to terminate the living relationship, when selling one debt of the E-owned house of KRW 680,000,000 in Namyang-do, the Defendant sold the above house of KRW 764,00,000 to G, etc. on or around January 28, 2010, and the Defendant had the obligation to pay KRW 100,000 to the victim.

On February 10, 2010, the Defendant owed the victim with false debt by establishing a mortgage creation registration of the amount of KRW 1706,606,000,000 owned by the Defendant with some of the above KRW 760,000,00 to Hayang-si, Gyeonggi-do, which purchased the Defendant with some of the above KRW 760,000,000 with the intent to escape the enforcement of the victim, with the aim of paying the said debt at the Namyang-do District Court of 158-4, Dongyang-dong, 158-4, 158-4, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A report on investigation (report attached to a judgment) and judgment attached thereto;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a real estate sales contract, such as a written authentication, an authentic copy of the judgment, a full certificate of registered matters, a statement of entry into and departure from Korea banks, a statement

1. The defendant for sentencing under Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the relevant criminal facts is the first offender. While the victim was paid KRW 50 million through a lawsuit of demurrer against the distribution (the District Court Decision 2011Da49516) against the defendant, the defendant denies his/her criminal act even though he/she did not repay his/her debt to the victim, and the nature of the crime is not good, such as not only denies his/her criminal act, but also failing to receive a letter from the victim, and all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the defendant shall be sentenced to the same punishment as the order, and the statutory detention is made to give the defendant an opportunity to recover from damage.