On October 26, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “If the Defendant lends KRW 70 million to the victim, he/she shall repay the money to him/her up to April 26, 2012, and that he/she will offer it as security because he/she has paid a deposit for the lease of a private teaching institute with KRW 100 million.”

However, at the time, the Defendant reported the deficit above KRW 8 million in the course of operating a private teaching institute. Personal bond and financial debt were over KRW 80,000,000,000, and the economic situation has deteriorated to the extent that the Plaintiff was unable to pay to the instructors while operating the private teaching institute. The lease deposit provided by the Defendant as security was not remaining due to the Defendant’s failure to pay a monthly rent. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the above money.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the above victim and received KRW 70,000 from the victim as the borrowed money.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the time, there was no fact that he provided the leased deposit as security at the time, he did not intend to acquire the leased deposit, and that he did not make the repayment due to economic difficulties, even though he had the intent or ability to repay at the time.

On October 26, 2011, the deception of the instant facts charged by the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C that “on April 26, 2012, if the Defendant lent KRW 70,00,00 to the victim, he/she shall repay the money to the victim, and that the Plaintiff will offer it as security because there is KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

However, in the process of lending money from the victim on October 26, 201, the defendant recorded a conversation between the defendant, the victim, the defendant and the victim, and the G where the defendant borrowed money from the victim.