2. The defendants are above.

From February 11, 2016 to March 25, 2016, the Defendants leased a room room Nos. 4202 and 302, the Defendants employed female employees, such as the E and F, and let female employees find out the name of the customer, such as two police officers, he/she received cash of 12 to 130,000 won per time from the male who is unable to find out of the name of the customer, and made the said male to have sexual intercourse with the said male. The Defendants paid the money of KRW 80,000 per time out of the sexual traffic amount received from customers to female employees to gain profits of KRW 6,880,00.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F and E;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, I, and J;

1. A protocol of seizure (voluntary submission), list of seizure, voluntary submission, and a written waiver of ownership;

1. A real estate lease agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (No. 19 through 21, 24, 33 through 35, 43)

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic for the relevant criminal facts, Articles 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. A defendant who has been confiscated: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging and Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - favorable circumstances for sentencing - both the Defendants: The Defendants’ reflects, Defendant A did not have any previous conviction for the same kind of fine twice; Defendant B did not have any previous conviction for the same kind of crime; Defendant A’s above suspension of indictment for the unfavorable circumstances: The Defendant A’s disposition of the suspension of indictment is a obscenity ex officio; Defendant B can take into account the attitude of the legal order more than 10 times in total, including three previous years of the suspension of the execution of this paper and three times. - Other conditions for sentencing specified in the records of the instant case, including the Defendants’ age, sex, health, home environment, motive, means, results, and circumstances after the crime.