However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Freight.

On April 16, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.152% at the 0.152% of the scopical alcohol level on the 19:34, the 19:34, the 19:4, and the Defendant driven the above vehicle along the two lanes between the three-lanes of the scopic area of the gold officer.

At the time, it is a main road that has frequent traffic of vehicles, and in such a case, the defendant, who is engaged in driving the motor vehicle, has a duty of care to avoid accidents in advance by putting the steering gear and operating the steering gear according to the traffic situation of the location.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the back portion of the victim D's D's vehicle from the front part of the victim D's vehicle due to the negligence of finding the victim D's 29 years old-age E's vehicle which was stopped at the front of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle, and caused the victim D's vehicle to receive the rear part of the victim D's vehicle due to the shock.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, damaged the victim D to the extent that the victim H (the victim H) who boarded the victim D’s vehicle for about two (2) weeks of injury, such as salt, tension, etc., caused the victim D to suffer from various kinds of harm, which requires multiple medical treatment for about two (2) weeks of injury to the victim F, and at the same time, damaged the victim D’s 2,181,750 won of repair cost by exchanging the victim D’s vehicle with the rear part of the vehicle by exchanging the back part of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not immediately stop and check the damage situation, and take necessary measures, such as taking relief measures.