beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.01.13 2014구합104468

상하수도 사용료 부과처분 취소 청구

Text

1. Each water supply and sewerage fee stated in Paragraph 3 of the attached Form 1, against the plaintiff, as of the date of each imposition specified in Paragraph 2 of the same Article.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The parties 1) The defendant, around 1990, on the 725-1 Japanese Won-dong 90,305.5 Korean Industrial Placement and Factory Establishment Act (amended by Act No. 4574 of Aug. 5, 1993; hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Placement Act").

(i) an agro-industrial complex under the Agricultural and Industrial Complex (hereinafter referred to as “instant agro-industrial complex”).

A) Around 1993, the Plaintiff created and sold it to occupant enterprises. A public city is a waterworks business operator that supplies tap water within the jurisdiction of public cities, including the instant agro-industrial complex. 2) The Plaintiff is a non-corporate group established with 19 enterprises located in the instant agro-industrial complex as its members pursuant to Article 31(2) and (6) of the Industrial Placement Act, which is a management agency of the instant agro-industrial complex, entrusted the management business of public facilities, such as water supply, sewerage, roads, landscaping, etc. in the instant agro-industrial complex, pursuant to Article 31(1) of the Industrial Placement Act.

B. The instant agro-industrial complex has a water pipe and a water pipe on the underground of the road in the complex as follows, and the water pipe and a water pipe are installed in an agro-industrial complex, and each company is installed within the factory site of an individual occupant company. 2) The Defendant has, so far, paid the water rate only to the Plaintiff by measuring all tap water consumption using the water meter without paying the water rate for each occupant company.

The plaintiff divided the total water rate of each company according to the quantity measured by the measuring instruments of each company, and collected it from the occupant company and paid the total water rate to the defendant.

Water pipes and water pipes for each business entity;

C. The water leakage and the water leakage of each disposition of this case, each of which was taken by each business entity, the quantity used in measuring instruments, each of the dispositions of this case (metric tons) taken on November 22, 2013; 35,390; 32,1123,123, 278; 233, 238, 297329, 384, 635; 231, 467; 25, 284; 283, Feb. 29, 2014;